Habershon, Matthew
Halfpenny, Joseph
Halfpenny, William
Haller von Hallerstein, Karl
Hamilton, Sir James, of Fynnart
Hamilton, Thomas
Hans von Berckheim
Hans von Strasburg
Hansen, Hans Christian
Hansen, Theophilus
Harmandus
Hardouin-Mansart, Jules
Hardouin-Mansart de Jouy, Jean
Hardouin-Mansart de Sagonne, Jacques
Harleman, Karl Freiherr von
Harrison, Henry G.
Harsdorf, Caspar Frederik
Hasenauer, Karl Freiherr von
Haussmam, Georges Eugčne
Hawksmoor, Nicholas
Haya, Rodrigo del
Hegias of Athens
Heideloff, Karl Alexander von
Heinrich von Ulm
Helm, Willem van der
Henri de Bruxelles
Henry de Estria
Héré de Corny, Emmanuel
Herlewin
Hermodoros
Hermogenes
Hernández, Gerónimo
Hernandez, Gregorio
Herrera, Francisco
Herrera, Juan de
Hildebert
Hipppodamus
Hirsvogel, Augustin
Hirsvogel, Veit
Hittorff, Jacques Ignace
Hoban, James
Holl, Elias
Holland, Henry
Hollar, Wenceslas
Holt, Thomas
Holzschuher, Eucharius Karl
Hoo, William de
Hooke, Robert
Horleman, Baron Charles
Horton, Thomas de
Houdon, Jean Antoine
Hübsch, Heinrich
Hugh of Lincoln, Saint
Hultz, Hans
Hunt, Richard Morris
Huvé, Jean Jacques Marie
Huyot, Jean Nicolas
Hylmer, John
| |
peter's canon
2008.08.23 22:55
To suspect that Eisenman's process conceals a much more pliant process doesn't eliminate Gehry's already self-evident very pliant process. Gehry's entire oeuvre is evidence of a very pliant design process.
Has Eisenman really been designing a process? It looks to me more like he's been designing a determinism, and I am personally aware of an aspect of Eisenman's process that proves very inflexible.
|