If it isn't remotely buildable (if it flies in the face of the laws of physics, for example), can it really be called architecture? | why would anyone want to keep such a narrow limitation on the defintiion of architecture, how could anyone think that architecture would only pertain to something built? no one wants to see the loss of architecture's definition to oblivion, but come on, architecture is more than buildings. |
|
so what is the newest amendment, or addition to the definition of architecture? |
Did Piranesi ever call himself an architect? I always thought that mantle was placed about his shoulder by later generations! [sic]
|
Quondam © 2006.12.09 |