www.quondam.com/63/6270.htm

I wonder why some people here always need to justify what is powerful in architecture by appealing to the lowest and grossest sense of utility. Why are so many "real" architects so insecure about understanding architecture in a broader sense? Why are they so threatened by the virtual, and by any effort to pursue what the poetry and beauty of architecture? Isn't this narrow sense of "reality" a profound debasement of architecture, and a total abdication of responsibility?

««««

»»»»