| |
"I see sham pane, but no glasses"
2007.05.10 09:16
The moving vehicle is frozen, in space, to become architecture, and timeless. It was never launched. It will never fall.*
"Without going too deeply into the theory of historiography, it must be said that if all interpretation of an artist's work was forced to rely on what the artist himself would have understood, the art of history would itself be in a bad way..."
So, what you're saying is that the art of history is in a good way because of the acceptance of post ex facto interpretation? My, how convenient. Very sham pane.
"This is the first part of a [never happened] three-part review article on recent and past P. studies."
Hey, let's interpret what parts two and three are!
"Like a detective or an analyst, the architect's job is now to find some way to make sense out of this 'heap of fragments.'"
Sorry, that position's been filled since 1998.
"Would you be ready to submit ideas not somewhere hidden in a[n] Archinect thread, but via e-mail...?"
So, what you're saying is that ideas submitted via email are not more "hidden"?
Welcome to the wedding of Dean [von] Architecture and Fanny Tissue.
Yes, that's right, there's now a Fanny Tissue Architecture.
=====
*I'll tell you what's hidden so far, it's the [subplots]. And, of course, that's what [subplots] should be.
|